0
6 shares

Panay Electric Company (PECO) Adminitrative Manager, Marcelo Cacho together with his counsel, Estrella Elamparo recently faced the media to give details about the Supreme Court’s decision of denying MORE Electric and Power Corp. to expropriate the power distribution assets of PECO.

Prior to the Supreme Court decision, the Mandaluyong City RTC Branch 209 said MORE’s expropriation and takeover of PECO’s electric distribution assets unconstitutional. The declaration was made on July 1, 2019.

MORE’s argument is based on Republic Act 11212 which grants MORE the franchise to distribute power in Iloilo City. Under Sections 10 and 17 of RA 11212, MORE is authorized to exercise the power of eminent domain over all the distribution assets and properties of PECO in the franchise area.

The Mandaluyong RTC, however, declared Sections 10 and 17 of RA 11212 void and unconstitutional for infringing on PECO’s rights to due process and equal protection of the law.

The RTC also declared,

“Consequently, PECO has no obligation to sell and MORE has no right to expropriate PECO’s assets under Sections 10 and 17 of RA 11212; and, PECO’s rights to its properties are protected against arbitrary and confiscatory taking under the relevant portions of Sections 10 and 17 of RA 11212.”

In a resolution dated August 14, 2019, the Supreme Court denied MORE’s prayer for an issuance of a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) and/or writ of preliminary injunction against the Mandaluyong Regional Trial Court resolution.

MORE Electric and Power Corp. is owned by ports magnate Enrique Razon who is racing against a two-year deadline under its franchise to begin operating, otherwise its franchise will be deemed automatically revoked.

But with the SC’s denial of the TRO, MORE is prevented from proceeding with the expropriation while it is deciding whether to affirm the declaration of unconstitutionality by the Mandaluyong court.

Meanwhile, the Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (CPCN) issued by the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) last May 21 allows PECO to continue to operate the distribution system until the establishment or acquisition by the grantee MORE of its own distribution system and its complete transition toward full operations, which will not exceed two years from the grant of the legislative franchise.

“Any expropriation efforts by Razon’s MORE has been disallowed by the Supreme Court and if they’re truly serious to serve the people of Iloilo, they will do what it takes to invest and do what Pres. Duterte has called on all businesses: BUILD, BUILD, BUILD, and not TAKE, TAKE, TAKE. And quoting the president himself: Wag mag-agaw ng negosyo,” PECO Administrative Manager Marcelo Cacho said in a press briefing.

In a separate resolution dated September 2, 2019, the Supreme Court declared MORE’s conduct of “vigorously pursuing the expropriation case while appealing at the same time the judgment of the Mandaluyong RTC” as constituting “an insidious form of forum-shopping, both direct and indirect contempt.” The SC then resolved to require MORE and Judge Yvette Go of the Iloilo City RTC to file comment regarding this.

“Panay Electric Company has been serving Iloilo for the last 95 years. We would like to believe that in that span of time, we have been a major part of Iloilo’s journey towards development and economic prosperity,” Cacho noted. “We will ensure that as we do the right thing—and we enjoin Ricky Razon’s MORE to also do the right thing—we will strengthen our resolve to continue serving and finding the best energy solutions for the people of Iloilo while abiding by whatever decision the Supreme Court hands down,” Cacho stressed.

Here’s a video of the interview with Cacho and counsel Elamparo:

Follow Me

raindeocampo

Training Facilitator at TeamCITE
Writer, Wanderer, Child of God
Follow Me

Like it? Share with your friends!

0
6 shares
raindeocampo

Writer, Wanderer, Child of God

0 Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *